Harry’s Surrogacy Scandal: What Would Be The Consequences?

The use of a surrogate by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle has been a topic of discussion for a while now.

While Meghan has been the center of attention, Lady C believes that Harry is equally culpable.

She argues that unless Meghan stole his DNA, he voluntarily gave it, and therefore deliberately sullied the line of succession.

This would be a trespass against fifty-six countries comprising 2.6 billion people who were guaranteed an appropriate bloodline within the line of succession.

If a surrogacy arrangement had been entered into and had not been found safe by the powers that be, it would be a very serious matter indeed.

It would be so incendiary it may never come to light because it would be perceived as so damaging to the institution, and to the country's best interests.

They would find another way of dealing with the consequences in terms of the line of succession.

Lady C refrains from saying more for legal reasons.

If it was true, she doesn't see how any institution would be able to wash his hands of the consequences.

It would be devastating for the institution because the question would be, why did they do nothing when they found out?

If they never found out as a fact, they only had suspicions, that would also be damaging because the average person would find it very difficult to accept or believe that such a powerful institution had been unable to get to the bottom of things.

The likelihood would be that, even if they found out the truth, they would have to abide by the law, and therefore be hamstrung and unable to do anything.

There would be an awful lot of consequences if such an eventuality were proven to have occurred.

Lady C implies that this would be a bad idea for Meghan.

If the children were born via surrogacy, Harry probably wouldn't want that coming out either, so they could equally hold it over each other's heads.

If they were, unless Harry could come up with a very good reason as to why he didn't know, it would not bode well for him.

Both Harry and Andrew were cultivated by outsiders because of their ties to the royal family, and now both are suffering.

Lady C tells us she was reliably informed that Andrew was induced to go to America after Epstein got out of jail.

Epstein encouraged Andrew to walk with him in the park, and made sure a photographer was there to capture it.

She states again that the picture with Virginia Gifford was fabricated by people Andrew had considered friends.

She also says, if you lie down with dogs, don't be surprised if you come up with fleas.

It's possible Harry realized he made a terrible mistake when he returns home for the funeral.

Perhaps he fears the book will make him a pariah in the UK forever.

He may have been dumbfounded by the outpouring of love from the crowds.

Maybe he was primed by that experience to rethink matters.

At this point, it costs us nothing to keep an open mind and give him the benefit of the doubt.

Is it the case that, if she divorces him, she gets to keep her title and it cannot be removed?

If it looks like King Charles is likely to remove the titles, maybe she's getting in quick.

If they were divorced while she's Duke of Sussex, she would legally thereafter remain Meghan, Duchess of Sussex.

Even if his titles were later strips were put into a vance, she would remain at Meghan, Duchess of Sussex.

Another angle into Meghan's treachery could be the divorce plan, which gets Harry back into good graces, only to have Meghan show up at Frogmore in a few months for a grand reconciliation.

They are for sure up to some new scheme to both sell books, and gain royal perks.

Lady C thinks that is a shrewd observation, and signs off.