Connect with us

Meghan Markle Never Pregnant and Employed Surrogate, Claims Midwife

Photos: GETTY

Royal Family News

Meghan Markle Never Pregnant and Employed Surrogate, Claims Midwife

A midwife has come forward to claim that was never pregnant and instead employed a surrogate to carry her children, and .

The rumours about Meghan using a surrogate have been circulating for years, with questions raised about whether was really born at Portland Hospital in London.

The midwife, who spoke on Quora, revealed that she and her husband are both medical professionals.

She explained that Meghan had been given pain relief during labour, including an inhalant called Entonox, commonly known as laughing gas.

This was verified by Harry in his book Spare.

The midwife also claimed that Meghan had been given pain and relaxant medication orally or by injection, before finally receiving an epidural which paralysed everything from the waist down.

Trending:

The midwife's conclusion is that it would have been impossible for Meghan to stand or walk just two hours after giving birth, as has been reported in the media.

She believes that if the truth is told in Harry's book, then Meghan's whole pregnancy could be a lie.

The air of mystery surrounding Archie began with Meghan's ever-changing baby bump.

But what really confused people was Harry's comment about seeing a child change so much in the first two weeks.

Was Archie actually older than what was released?

The birth certificate says he was born on May 6th, and his debut to the world was two or three days later.

So was this a slip of the tongue from Harry, or an accident?

Even Meghan's sister Samantha Markle has claimed that Meghan used a surrogate.

She alleged that the surrogate was reluctant to hand the baby over, forcing Meghan to carry a doll during public engagements.

Samantha also claimed that Meghan picked up her eggs in Los Angeles before Archie was born.

There is no DNA proof that Archie is Harry's son, and there is no proof that either Archie or were delivered from Meghan's womb, which is a requirement for titles under British law.

Samantha believes that this should prevent Meghan and Harry's children from receiving royal titles, even though their parents have already made it clear that they don't want the kids to have them.

The rumours about Meghan's pregnancy have been circulating for years, with many people questioning the authenticity of her baby bump.

The midwife's claims add fuel to the fire, and raise questions about the truth behind Meghan's pregnancy and the birth of her children.

It remains to be seen whether Meghan will respond to these claims, but for now, the mystery surrounding her pregnancy and the birth of her children continues to intrigue and captivate the public.

Top stories:

More in Royal Family News

To Top