Meghan Markle’s Pregnancy Controversy: Was She Ever Pregnant with Lilibet?

A video has surfaced on social media that suggests Meghan Markle was never pregnant with her last baby, Lilibet.

Instead, she may have used a surrogate and lied to the public for a long time.

The Royal Grift on YouTube has a video breakdown of the Netflix show where Meghan is seen stress-drinking wine while pregnant with Lilibet.

This would indicate that Meghan hasn't been pregnant since she met Harry.

Moreover, someone on Twitter referred to a recent YouTube video by one of the popular Megs-eteers, in which she says that Meghan's dad, brother, and sister all claim Meghan had a hysterectomy at 28 or 29 because she had so many abortions.

Samantha, Meghan's sister, claimed that Meghan was not truthful about what she shared about her childhood during a televised interview with Oprah in 2021, alleging that as a result, she was subjected to humiliation, shame, and hatred on a worldwide scale.

There have been rumors that Meghan told past lovers she was unable to get pregnant and that during a first marriage, they tried to conceive without success.

She didn't bear either of those children who may or may not be real.

However, the timelines and birth math don't add up, and neither of them are clever liars, able to keep the lies straight, making nothing make sense.

Last year, the doctor who allegedly delivered Meghan and Harry's daughter Lilibet down at Mountbatten, Windsor shut down her practice.

This was brought up by the Daily Mail.

The doctor's name is Melissa Drake, and she catered to pregnant women in Santa Barbara.

She cited her health and wanting to spend time with her family, according to an Instagram post.

It's alleged that her patients are not happy to have been given little notice.

What's more, if she was leaving a practice for health reasons, she could have hired someone to step in for her until she was ready to return.

Also, it's odd that no one knew who Meghan's OBGYN was until the story came out.

Meghan has always said, “my kids are not public property, so back off” or something like that.

Not to mention, Omid Scobie and Caroline Durand wrote in Finding Freedom that a particular UK doctor oversaw Archie's birth, but the doctor's husband allegedly came out and said his wife didn't deliver Archie, that she wasn't working that day.

Could it be possible that Dr. Drake has some juicy secrets about Lilibet that she doesn't want to get out?

The doctor's name wasn't made public at the time of Lily's birth.

So first off, how do people know Dr. Drake even delivered Lily?

We know that Lily's birth certificate is majorly off because a parent cannot put a foreign title on a US birth certificate.

At least in California, you can't.

Could it be possible that people started questioning whether Dr. Drake was allegedly issuing fake birth certificates, signing off on births that didn't happen?

It's entirely possible, but the question remains: why didn't Dr. Drake get called out when the alleged fake birth certificate was released?

The lies and falsifications surrounding Meghan's pregnancy just seem unnecessary, and the public deserves the truth.

In conclusion, the controversy surrounding Meghan Markle's pregnancy continues to raise questions and doubts.

Was she ever pregnant with Lilibet, or did she use a surrogate?

Who delivered Lilibet, and why hasn't the doctor been publicly identified?