Harry’s Failed Relationship with Chelsea Davy: Personal Reasons or Press Interference?

Prince Harry's legal battle with Mirror Group newspapers has brought to light his failed relationship with Chelsea Davy.

The prince claimed that persistent media intrusion led to their break-up in 2010.

However, British socialite and royal author, Lady Colin Campbell, has a different perspective.

She believes that personal reasons, not press interference, caused the split.

During a conversation with GB news host, Dan Wooten, Lady CE expressed scepticism towards Harry's claims.

She proposed that Davy's disinterest in royal life and her life with Harry was the key factor in the separation.

Lady CE also suggested that Prince Harry habitually attributes his shortcomings to external factors.

“Harry can't face the fact that it's not the paper that broke up his relationship with Chelsea.

It's that he didn't cut the mustard for her for the long term,” Campbell stated, adding that this is a classical sign of an inadequate personality.

Phil Dampier, a royal biographer, agreed with Campbell, suggesting that press intrusion wasn't the root cause of the couple's separation.

Instead, he opined that both Davy and Chriseida Bonas, another ex-girlfriend of Prince Harry, weren't fit for the princess role, and their relationships were unlikely to culminate in marriage.

Dampier also added that Davy was probably the one that got away for Harry.

He noted that the prince seemed most content when he was in Africa with Davy, hinting at a deep connection between the two.

In a veiled jab at Meghan Markle, Harry's current wife, Dampier stated, “There's no doubt in my mind that he would have been much happier with Chelsea Davy.”

Prince Harry's legal statement contends that constant media intrusion created substantial hurdles in his relationship with Davy.

He further claimed that Davy chose to end their relationship due to the relentless harassment by journalists.

Harry also spilled in court that Meghan claimed to be pregnant before the wedding.

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry tied the knot on May 19th, 2019.

The couple announced the Duchess of Sussex's first pregnancy while they were in Australia in October of the same year.

However, some royal fans are convinced that Markle was already pregnant when she got married.

David Byron, a follower of the royal family, sarcastically suggested that the former actress was absolutely and totally pregnant when she tied the knot.

More specifically, she was already four weeks pregnant, and Prince Harry knew that.

That's one of the reasons that Meghan worked so hard to stick it to her father to get him to pull out of the wedding with his fake heart attack.

It made them laugh that Prince Charles would then walk a pregnant woman down the aisle in front of billions of people and not know a thing about it, he said.

One Markle supporter thought that Byron's response wasn't meant to be sarcastic.

Janine Blackburn said that it's shocking how some people say Markle's pregnancy was too long, while others would say that she sported a fake baby bump.

Another royal fan explained to Blackburn what Byron was trying to say.

He's not hating on Meghan, he's making fun of the question.

What he's saying, that the gestation of a human being takes nine months, and little Archie was born 14 months after Harry and Meghan married, so there's no possible way she was pregnant when they married, Cheryl Clare stated.

In conclusion, Lady Colin Campbell and Phil Dampier believe that personal reasons, not press interference, caused Prince Harry's failed relationship with Chelsea Davy.

While Harry claims that media intrusion created substantial hurdles in their relationship, Campbell and Dampier suggest that Davy's disinterest in royal life and her life with Harry was the key factor in the separation.