Super-Injunctions: The Secret Tool of the Rich and Famous

The rich and famous, including A-list celebrities and even royals, can pay a hefty price to have a super-injunction put in place.

According to a freelance journalist who works closely with a well-known national newspaper, a super-injunction is a powerful tool that provides massive protection to those who want to avoid defamation and prevent the publication of private information.

More importantly, it also prevents media outlets from publicizing the existence of the injunction.

The cost for this service is said to be £200,000 or more.

Celebrities are usually the ones who opt to pay a lot of money to use the law to prevent information from being published.

However, people need to understand the difference between public interest and what the public is interested in.

Everyone likes to hear juicy gossip, but the bottom line is whether it will be of any benefit to those who want to hear it.

This form of secret justice has been applied by those among us who have enormous amounts of money, and it is not open to scrutiny by the public.

This explains why newspapers avoided writing about the subject of Markle's suspected surrogate children and why Charles never gave Archie and Lilibet royal titles.

The theory suggests that the two children do not exist, or if they do, they were born of a surrogate.

If either assertion is correct, the children have no place in the line of succession, and the public has a right to know.

The palace should put an end to all this tedious speculation.

If the children were indeed born via a surrogate, it seems a real shame that this wasn't made clear in the beginning.

Many parents have dealt with this issue, so it wouldn't have been a scandal.

It's like the palace felt Harry's chances of actually having a shot at the throne were extremely small, so they just left things alone.

If the unthinkable happened, however, then they would suddenly have a huge problem.

This is what happens when lies get told instead of being open and honest in the first place.

In this era of social media and access to everything, it really makes little sense to continue charades like this.

During King Edward and Wallis Simpson's scandal, it was not mentioned in the British press until months later, when the king revealed his intention to abdicate.

Back to Harry and Meghan, a super-injunction would explain the silence from journalists and the surrogacy announcement from Kensington Palace that was deleted after ten minutes.

Many often argue that the royal family doesn't know anything about Meghan, but the fact is the opposite.

It is said that the royals know everything about Meghan Markle.

They just pretended they didn't know to let it go.

Do you really think that somebody could marry into the royal family without MI6 making criminal checks?

There would also be checks on nationality, parents, and other family members.

They would have interviewed friends of friends to see whether all stories stack up.

Their report would have been handed to the queen.

The truth will come out sooner or later.

King Charles is probably giving it time to put some space between Her Majesty the Queen's passing and announcing or removing the phantom children from the line of succession.

It is highly likely that Harry and Meghan will be removed for treason.