Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s Backyard Wedding: The Truth Behind the Claims

In a bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey, Meghan Markle revealed that she and Prince Harry actually tied the knot in their backyard before their lavish public ceremony at Windsor Castle on May 19th, 2018.

However, the Archbishop of Canterbury has confirmed that this claim is not true.

Writing in his memoir Spare, Harry revealed that the small ceremony was just the two of them, with Guy and Pula as the only witnesses.

It was unofficial and non-binding, except in their souls.

The Archbishop reached the official part and spoke a few words that made them the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, titles bestowed by the Queen.

He joined them until death do them part, though he had already done something similar days earlier in their garden.

They were grateful for every person in and around St. George's and watching on TV, but their real matrimony was in private.

As magical as the formal ceremony was, they both came to feel slightly frightened of crowds.

However, the Archbishop of Canterbury has confirmed that Meghan and Harry were not legally married in their back garden three days before the royal wedding.

The wedding seen by millions across the world was the real deal.

The Archbishop claimed that he had a number of private and pastoral meetings with the couple before the wedding, but the legal wedding was on the Saturday.

He signed the wedding certificate, which is a legal document, and would have committed a serious criminal offence if he signed it knowing it was false.

Stephen Borton, who drew up the licence for the wedding, previously told The Sun that Meghan was obviously confused and clearly misinformed.

They did not marry three days earlier.

The special licence he helped draw up enabled them to marry at St George's Chapel in Windsor.

What happened there on May 19th, 2018, and was seen by millions around the world was the official wedding as recognised by the Church of England and the law.

He suspected that they exchanged some simple vows they had perhaps written themselves in front of the Archbishop, or it was a rehearsal.

The Markle logic is the opposite of what they say, so in fact, they would have loved a big wedding in somewhere like Westminster Abbey, but as the sixth in line, Harry was not entitled to it.

Thus, they pretend that they did not want one, making everyone else seem like status-obsessed pretentious idiots instead.

This is how their backward spin works, and they do it with everything, but the flaws become obvious when the freedom fighters refuse to relinquish their titles.

As usual, Harry's claims did not sit well with royal fans.

One person wrote that the notion that the Archbishop did a small ceremony in the garden is just as bad as the first consecration of their love.

The garden vow rehearsal was not a ceremony and was not consecrated.

A consecrated ceremony is the marriage, a rite of the church.

Either Harry does not understand those words, or he is repeating Meghan's opral eye.

Another commented that the Archbishop of Canterbury did not make them the Duke and Duchess of Sussex; he married them.

Harry's title was not bestowed by Granny; it was bestowed by the monarch to Harry.

Nothing was bestowed upon Meghan; she is the Duchess as a courtesy title of the marriage.

In conclusion, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's backyard wedding was not legally binding, as confirmed by the Archbishop of Canterbury.

The official wedding was the one seen by millions around the world, and the legal document was signed on that day.

Harry's claims in his memoir and Meghan's statements in the interview with Oprah Winfrey have been proven false.